PDA

View Full Version : Your Mile time


Arrow
09-29-2005, 12:12 AM
I know we're all sprinters, but I was wondering what your mile times are? Also list whether you run 100, 200, or 400. 800m shouldn't be included, however, because they're considered more of the distance type. As for me, my mile time SUCKS

skifree
09-29-2005, 12:21 AM
I run 110 hurdles, tj/lj/hj, and my mile time is a staggering 5:47!

Brumund-Smith
09-29-2005, 01:03 AM
4:45 (road race)

one_more_hurdler
09-29-2005, 01:07 AM
4:56...time trial freshmen year (the only time i ever ran it)

hurdlingham123
09-29-2005, 01:14 AM
i'm no distance runner, and i've never actually run just a mile race, but my best split in cross country was a 6:46 (i'm a girl)

one_more_hurdler
09-29-2005, 01:33 AM
i'm no distance runner, and i've never actually run just a mile race, but my best split in cross country was a 6:46 (i'm a girl)

wait...are you saying that you ran 6:46 all 3 splits? cuz that really good for a girl. our #1 girl ran 19:34 and made it to borderclash (washington vs. oregon) and you're only 4 sec off her pr with a 19:38.

wineturtle
09-29-2005, 04:01 AM
45 years ago I ran a 4:50i &was a 23.5r/53.5r guy

Renbircs
09-29-2005, 10:01 AM
wait...are you saying that you ran 6:46 all 3 splits? cuz that really good for a girl. our #1 girl ran 19:34 and made it to borderclash (washington vs. oregon) and you're only 4 sec off her pr with a 19:38.

Split doesn't mean average pace.

Arrow
09-29-2005, 06:04 PM
How is it possible that all of you are so fast in the mile when the statistics say that only like 10% of the sprint event is aerobic? Where do you get your aerobic endurance from?

Sprints07
09-29-2005, 06:15 PM
I threw down a 5:10 my freshmen year, I run the 100 200 and 400.

remiks
09-29-2005, 06:34 PM
How is it possible that all of you are so fast in the mile when the statistics say that only like 10% of the sprint event is aerobic? Where do you get your aerobic endurance from?

Talent; some distance runners can come down and run 11.x and 23.x.

Andre.
09-29-2005, 07:11 PM
I run like a 5:10-20ish mile. I also run the 400, but am moving up to distance instead.

boon322
09-29-2005, 07:22 PM
im a 110H guy, 15.27

my mile time is 5:11 from last fall, i didn't get a shot to run it this year though so ill have to wait til the gym mile to throw down PR (unless i have a meet that day like usual)

Speed-driven
09-29-2005, 11:37 PM
i run the 400m..and my best mile time is 5:20..this crazi girl at my school..runs a 5:17 mile..iunno about her 3 mile though..id say 18 something..

rhssprinter
09-30-2005, 08:05 PM
I'm a girl, my best is like 6:30ish

Sully 800
09-30-2005, 09:29 PM
4:55 1600

LilRunnerKid1990
09-30-2005, 10:30 PM
4:49

elcaballo
09-30-2005, 11:04 PM
100- 11.6
200- 23.2
400- 50.5
600- 1:25
800- 2 04
mile 4 56
LJ 20'2"
TJ 42'7"

Ace-Tres
09-30-2005, 11:09 PM
wait...are you saying that you ran 6:46 all 3 splits? cuz that really good for a girl. our #1 girl ran 19:34 and made it to borderclash (washington vs. oregon) and you're only 4 sec off her pr with a 19:38.

I've split a 5:04 in a 3 mile race, doesnt mean I ran a 15:12.

Arrow
09-30-2005, 11:31 PM
I'm assuming all you sprinters are exceptions. What's a good mile time for a sprinter aiming at 24 200m and 56 400m ?

Sum_Bum
09-30-2005, 11:32 PM
3:59

sprinter200
10-01-2005, 12:37 AM
4:59 i run 200/400s

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-01-2005, 02:04 AM
I'm assuming all you sprinters are exceptions. What's a good mile time for a sprinter aiming at 24 200m and 56 400m ?

i dont think it really matters, though if your a sprinter and are not able to run at least a 6:10 mile, then I think you still need to get in better shape


I am a hurdler/400m/TJ
never ran a mile in a meet .. never plan to lol .. cept a 1500 for a decathalon
fastest 1600 5:23

MaroonCat1600
10-01-2005, 01:39 PM
wow your fast

In_The_Shadows
10-01-2005, 02:01 PM
I'm a 100, 200, 400 guy and I ran 5:06 my sophomore year (I'm a senior), and that was the only time i've ever run one all out. I don't plan on trying to run the mile again in the near future.

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-01-2005, 02:06 PM
wow your fast

i like your sarcasm

gazzelle5
10-01-2005, 02:21 PM
ran a 1500m in 4:47 couple years ago in the pent. should be able to break 5 in the mile now

riggles
10-01-2005, 04:08 PM
1600-4:27
400-55.7
200-25.5
100-12.9
55-8.7

donegalxcrunner
10-01-2005, 07:58 PM
I'm a mid-distance runner in track and obviously a distance runner in XC.
I run the 400m and 800m in track but I run my 1600m fairly OK.
My PR in the 1600m is -4:42

-John

MontyXC1
10-01-2005, 10:12 PM
i think about 3/4 of these people are lying

clifbar
10-01-2005, 10:34 PM
My school's records in the 400m and mile are held by the same guy, who ran them in like 1964. Apparently he ran about a 50 second 400m, and they needed him to run the mile in a dual meet, so he ran a 4:24, and never ran it again. He never ran the 800 either.

Sum_Bum
10-01-2005, 11:56 PM
I'm pretty level

400- 55.9
800- 2:05.1
1600- 4:42.2

I do distance though

DuBey9
10-02-2005, 12:13 AM
4:41 (freshman year) sophmore this year

Sprints07
10-02-2005, 01:08 AM
My school's records in the 400m and mile are held by the same guy, who ran them in like 1964. Apparently he ran about a 50 second 400m, and they needed him to run the mile in a dual meet, so he ran a 4:24, and never ran it again. He never ran the 800 either.

Thats friggin crazy. The mile is about 10X more impressive than the 400. He prolly could've ran a killer 800. Thats really odd though.

Sum_Bum
10-02-2005, 01:09 AM
Your PRs are fat!

Fanya
10-02-2005, 12:05 PM
My school's records in the 400m and mile are held by the same guy, who ran them in like 1964. Apparently he ran about a 50 second 400m, and they needed him to run the mile in a dual meet, so he ran a 4:24, and never ran it again. He never ran the 800 either.

I feel bad for your school not having one guy under 4:25 in 41 years.

josheboy
10-02-2005, 01:28 PM
My school's records in the 400m and mile are held by the same guy, who ran them in like 1964. Apparently he ran about a 50 second 400m, and they needed him to run the mile in a dual meet, so he ran a 4:24, and never ran it again. He never ran the 800 either.

yea, thats cool. but im guessin that the guy w/the two records ran the mile and dropped down to the 400.USUALLY milers n such can run at least one fast lap. but idk,maybe i'm wrong

Sully 800
10-02-2005, 02:16 PM
Your PRs are fat!

I doubt it

PurpleHaze
10-02-2005, 02:54 PM
I feel bad for your school not having one guy under 4:25 in 41 years.

My school hasn't had anyone under 4:30 in 45 years.

riggles
10-02-2005, 02:54 PM
i think about 3/4 of these people are lying
1600-4:27
400-55.7
200-25.5
100-12.9
55-8.7

Ha yeah maybe but I wasn't. Like Sum Bum I'm a distance runner. I just saw the title of this thread and wanted to see what it was about. The only legitimate times on there though are my 1600 and 400. The 1600 was at states and the 400 was in some dual meet that I ran the 400 in to get some extra points and some speed work. The 200 was in a workout in indoor this year, the 100 was at the end of practice sophomore year I think and the 55 was when I was a freshman and got stuck running the 55 in the beginning of indoor because I was fat and slow.

skifree
10-02-2005, 06:32 PM
haha yea.. im just about the direct opposite of you^.

55HH- 7.9
110HH- 14.8/ 15.07 FAT
400IH- 58.5
LJ-21-1
TJ-46-3
HJ-6'
and when i was a freshmen I ran distance and was the worst runner on my team.
800- 2:38?
1600- 5:47
3200- 13:40... damn i was good at that race

riggles
10-02-2005, 08:11 PM
Ha yeah wasn't it a great feeling to find what you're good at and improve?

adidas400
10-02-2005, 08:39 PM
i run the 400 only and i do it in around 53 seconds and i ran the mile in gym in 5:43

Sully 800
10-02-2005, 08:46 PM
i think about 3/4 of these people are lying

I doubt that also....why do you think 3/4 of the people would lie?

one_more_hurdler
10-02-2005, 11:05 PM
I've split a 5:04 in a 3 mile race, doesnt mean I ran a 15:12.

i know...im a sprinter that runs xc. i just about always go out in about 5:15 to 5:20, but my best 5k time is only 17:09. i was just saying that if she ran all of her 3 miles consistent, that it would be a good time. so i was asking if she did.

Sully 800
10-03-2005, 12:51 AM
If someone is pointing out a miel split in a 5k chances are they mean its their fastest split, and thats why its significant.

trackrunner47
10-03-2005, 01:14 AM
100m 11.3
200m 22.5
400m 47.9
800m 1:51.6
1600m 4:25
3miles 15:30

one_more_hurdler
10-03-2005, 01:34 AM
100m 11.3
200m 22.5
400m 47.9
800m 1:51.6
1600m 4:25
3miles 15:30

whats your name?

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-03-2005, 10:50 AM
ur really good at everything from the 400-5k
not that your 1 and 2 are bad

Sully 800
10-03-2005, 12:35 PM
His 1600 and 3 mile are signifcantly worse than his 400 and 800. I would say the quality of his events from best to worst are as follows...

800m 1:51.6
400m 47.9
200m 22.5
1600m 4:25/3miles 15:30
100m 11.3

I have a hard time debating which is best between the last 3....they all seem fairly even.

trackrunner47
10-03-2005, 01:58 PM
My name is Stephen.

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-03-2005, 03:38 PM
His 1600 and 3 mile are signifcantly worse than his 400 and 800. I would say the quality of his events from best to worst are as follows...

800m 1:51.6
400m 47.9
200m 22.5
1600m 4:25/3miles 15:30
100m 11.3

I have a hard time debating which is best between the last 3....they all seem fairly even.

o its a 3mile not a 5k, still impressive
and i agree with the first two
im at a stand still with the rest

trackrunner47
10-03-2005, 07:13 PM
I ran the mile one time it was my FR year and all the other times are from last year.

runninsteve06
10-03-2005, 08:04 PM
I'm more of a distance runner but I've ran...

200-26
400-56
800-2:07 (which is considered a sprint or mid-distance)
1600-4:46
3200-10:44
3 mile-16:04
5k-16:45

Actually the Mile could also be considered a sprint (Pro runners) but for HS we'll just say it's not but there are a few that can run a pretty impressive 4 min. mile which is really good for a HS athlete.

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-03-2005, 09:39 PM
I'm more of a distance runner but I've ran...

200-26
400-56
800-2:07 (which is considered a sprint or mid-distance)
1600-4:46
3200-10:44
3 mile-16:04
5k-16:45

Actually the Mile could also be considered a sprint (Pro runners) but for HS we'll just say it's not but there are a few that can run a pretty impressive 4 min. mile which is really good for a HS athlete.

in pro 800-1500m runners are considered middle distance runners

Skibum657
10-03-2005, 10:23 PM
I ran a 5:34 sophomore year. I haven't run it seriously since.

My sprinting prs are 11.09 100 and 52.34 400.

Dalau
10-03-2005, 11:02 PM
Split doesn't mean average pace.
give em a break. lol, they're sprinters.


anywys, there was a 200/400m runner at my school in the 1960s named Mark Young. He ran 21.8 and 49.1, and one day, the coach needed him to score some extra points in a dual meet. he ran the mile that day and ran a 4:24!!! :eek: Too bad he never ran the 800m, or did more endurance running (I'm not sure if he did or not.). I got this info from my HS coach.

clifbar
10-04-2005, 12:19 AM
My school's records in the 400m and mile are held by the same guy, who ran them in like 1964. Apparently he ran about a 50 second 400m, and they needed him to run the mile in a dual meet, so he ran a 4:24, and never ran it again. He never ran the 800 either.
anywys, there was a 200/400m runner at my school in the 1960s named Mark Young. He ran 21.8 and 49.1, and one day, the coach needed him to score some extra points in a dual meet. he ran the mile that day and ran a 4:24!!! :eek: Too bad he never ran the 800m, or did more endurance running (I'm not sure if he did or not.). I got this info from my HS coach.

Wow Dan, wow.

one_more_hurdler
10-04-2005, 01:06 AM
His 1600 and 3 mile are signifcantly worse than his 400 and 800. I would say the quality of his events from best to worst are as follows...

800m 1:51.6
400m 47.9
200m 22.5
1600m 4:25/3miles 15:30
100m 11.3

I have a hard time debating which is best between the last 3....they all seem fairly even.

i have a hard time debating rather or not hes telling the truth or not...for washington marks that 800 time would be an all time state record, the 400 would have won state this year, the 200 would have taken top 5, the 100 would have taken 3rd, and the mile would have placed. the state champion ran a 15:24 in xc too. his time is only 6 sec off that. so if you could run more then 4 events, this kid would get 6 medals. im pretty sure that if he ran a 15:30 5k he could run a sub 10 min 2 mile.

AtownTx-Jurdler
10-04-2005, 12:37 PM
dont you add like 30-45 seconds to a 3mile to bump it up to a 5k?


but yea, i've been pretty skeptical, i just didnt want to say it and then it would turn out that he was this really good guy everyone knows about

Dalau
10-04-2005, 12:43 PM
I feel bad for your school not having one guy under 4:25 in 41 years.
We had a 4:25 and 4:26 miler if i remember correctly. His name was Vihann Kong (1996,1997ish. 2nd all-state in 800m). i'm not sure about the other guy, or if there was another guy. We also had a 4:30 miler and a 4:32 miler a few years ago.

Brumund-Smith
10-04-2005, 01:18 PM
We had a kid run 1:54.3 and 4:19.1 in 1986, and nobody else has even SNIFFED those times in the last 20 years.

trackrunner47
10-04-2005, 08:25 PM
All the time are my PR you can think what you whut.

Brumund-Smith
10-04-2005, 08:58 PM
All the time are my PR you can think what you whut.

HUH?!

one_more_hurdler
10-04-2005, 09:26 PM
dont you add like 30-45 seconds to a 3mile to bump it up to a 5k?


but yea, i've been pretty skeptical, i just didnt want to say it and then it would turn out that he was this really good guy everyone knows about

im not sure how much time you add to convert it to 5k. but i dont think its 45 sec. that seems kinda high to me.

slowest kid on the team
10-05-2005, 02:56 PM
All the time are my PR you can think what you whut.


proof? not that i dont beliueve you, im just curious about what races you ran those times in.

Jayhawk
10-05-2005, 04:45 PM
400- 49.30
600- 1:19.24
800- 1:52.82
Mile- 4:35 (cross country course)

Sum_Bum
10-05-2005, 04:49 PM
im not sure how much time you add to convert it to 5k. but i dont think its 45 sec. that seems kinda high to me.


Depends how slow you are going...it should be between 36-45

one_more_hurdler
10-05-2005, 11:42 PM
Depends how slow you are going...it should be between 36-45

wow that much? i was thinking like 15sec. lol

Sum_Bum
10-05-2005, 11:57 PM
The old conversion I used to do was (5k time/3)/8-(5k time/3) *3 for 3 mile split...reverse for a rough estimate of 5k.

EDIT: Assuming 1600m=1 mile

trackrunner47
10-06-2005, 01:44 AM
Well i won state in the 800m in Illinois that is all i have to show. But they are my PRs

barton_hurdler
10-06-2005, 01:44 AM
5:00 or 4:50 not sure which one, junior year of HS-indoors on a basketball gym at 12 1/2 laps so nobody knows how exact of distance it really is.

one_more_hurdler
10-06-2005, 09:32 PM
Well i won state in the 800m in Illinois that is all i have to show. But they are my PRs

whats the illinois state web site?

trackrunner47
10-07-2005, 01:35 PM
ihsa.org

ARAGON FroBoy
10-08-2005, 01:38 AM
Stephen Williams, Marion (H.S.) 1:51.84

one_more_hurdler
10-08-2005, 02:06 AM
damn thats really smoken.

sprintdistance
10-27-2005, 06:35 PM
I've ran 4:55 in XC practice and it was our fourth mile repeat and my 8th mile in practice. I run the 100, 200, 400 in track!

one_more_hurdler
10-28-2005, 08:15 PM
4:56...time trial freshmen year (the only time i ever ran it)

i just ran 4:53 last week in our end of the season time trail for xc. still sucks, but not to bad for a sprinter that runs xc for something to do.

XCboy
10-28-2005, 10:45 PM
5:01 in our time trail a couple of days ago. I was trying to go under five but I missed it barely. Sucked cause I thought I was way off so I didnt bother to kick. Oh well I'll try again next week.

shortput
10-28-2005, 11:35 PM
i hurdle (100m girls) and run a couple sprints in a meet each but my main event is throwing things because of knee problems and back problems i havent run a full mile in a while... probably somewhere just under seven