View Full Version : best time out of 100/200/400
bravesfanatic4
04-10-2005, 05:47 PM
i'm a distance guy and don't follow much about sprinting, but i'm just curious, there's a guy on my team with PR's of 11.1, 22.8, and 52.7... which of these is best?
Brumund-Smith
04-10-2005, 06:04 PM
That depends. Are they auto times or hand times? Open times or relay splits?
JSC.Rnr
04-10-2005, 06:51 PM
If they're all hand-timed and open, I'd say the 200.
Sully 800
04-10-2005, 07:37 PM
i think the 200 and 100 are relatively even and both slightly better than the 400.
Brumund-Smith
04-10-2005, 08:05 PM
I'm assuming they are all hand-timed, so I am going to have to go with the 200m. An 11.1 hand-timed really is probably around 11.50 to 11.60 auto-time, which I don't think is as good as a 23.1x auto time in the 200m.
However, if we are looking at FAT times of 11.10, 22.80 and 52.70, I would definitely say the 100m is the best.
Coach E
04-10-2005, 10:24 PM
Those are above-average times....for a tenth grader
Brumund-Smith
04-10-2005, 11:48 PM
Those are above-average times....for a tenth grader
I'm pretty sure that's not the issue here. Try not to put somebody down who is simply asking a question. Let's get the new Dyestat starting off on the right foot.
OneMoreRunner
04-11-2005, 03:41 AM
Alright, I'm actually learning stuff about sprinting. I said 200>100>400, and looks like most people agreed. cool!
watchout
04-11-2005, 04:12 AM
Brumund-Smith is right. 11.1 isn't as good as 22.8, unless it is FAT, in which case 11.1 is a little better. Both are better than 52.x, but they are all very good times.
those prs are almost identical to mine. ive run a 22.8 and i would say im the most happy with that.
remiks
04-11-2005, 11:31 PM
http://run-down.com/statistics/calc.php
According to the run-down calculator, the 11.1 is the best time, but the 200 is pretty close too.
JSC.Rnr
04-11-2005, 11:35 PM
I think the point we were making about HT vs FAT was that 11.1 hand-timed is probably more like 11.5 given reaction times, whereas a 22.8 isn't distorted as much by anticipation of the athlete finishing or by listening for the gun instead of watching for it.
AsthenicAthlete
04-12-2005, 02:50 PM
Those are above-average times....for a tenth grader Judging by his 1989 birthday, I'm guessing he IS a 10th grader. Not sure if this post was trying to put down his times or point his age out, either way, just saying.
Coach E
04-12-2005, 03:16 PM
Judging by his 1989 birthday, I'm guessing he IS a 10th grader. Not sure if this post was trying to put down his times or point his age out, either way, just saying.
No I wasnt trying to put anyone down, I figured he was in the 9th or 10th grade
AsthenicAthlete
04-12-2005, 03:22 PM
No I wasnt trying to put anyone down, I figured he was in the 9th or 10th grade Ok, my fault then. It just seemed like you were being sarcastic in your original post.
Suspect
04-13-2005, 12:48 AM
Judging by his 1989 birthday, I'm guessing he IS a 10th grader. Not sure if this post was trying to put down his times or point his age out, either way, just saying.
im 89... but im a freshman
theres a soph at my school that runs a 52... and his lifetime goal is to run a sub 50.... and lance gonzalez at my school ran a 51
Coach E
04-13-2005, 04:34 AM
im 89... but im a freshman
theres a soph at my school that runs a 52... and his lifetime goal is to run a sub 50.... and lance gonzalez at my school ran a 51
If the person is in the 10th grade and runs a 52, he should be able to at least get to 49 in the 400 by the 12th grade
Sully 800
04-13-2005, 11:45 AM
potentially it seems like he can improve to 49....however without knowing any background on him, other PR's or how he has improved I don't know that you can say he DEFINITELY can hit 49.0...I think that sub 50 as a lifetime goal doesn't seem very ambitious, but i also wouldnt say you can guarantee he'll go much faster.
Note: I know you said he SHOULD be able to coach, so I'm not just trying to argue with your point...just giving my opinion on the situation
cowboyjeff05
04-13-2005, 06:40 PM
i hit a 52.8 my soph year
my junior year my best run was a 53.3
then my senior year, my first 400 of the season was a 52.7, so as you can see, just bc you are a soph, you might not improve to a sub 49 by your senior year, but it all depends on various variables
Sully 800
04-13-2005, 09:18 PM
haha...various variables
cowboyjeff05
04-13-2005, 09:35 PM
hah im the alliteration master
danelons
04-28-2005, 10:45 PM
I'm pretty sure that's not the issue here. Try not to put somebody down who is simply asking a question. Let's get the new Dyestat starting off on the right foot.
He was saying they are BETTER! haha.
potentially it seems like he can improve to 49....however without knowing any background on him, other PR's or how he has improved I don't know that you can say he DEFINITELY can hit 49.0...I think that sub 50 as a lifetime goal doesn't seem very ambitious, but i also wouldnt say you can guarantee he'll go much faster.
Note: I know you said he SHOULD be able to coach, so I'm not just trying to argue with your point...just giving my opinion on the situation
i ran a 52 as a soph and i thought i would be hitting 49s junior year, or senior year. well i was the only returning varsity sprinter going into junior year, and no one else stepped up. so i had to quapruple every single meet. and i sat out of invites so i would just race league meets. well junior year i only hit 52 (i ran like 50 4x4 splits). and this year i only ended up running the 400 twice and had a season best 53. kinda depressing. i would be mad, but i never ever thought i would run a 10.9.
realstat23
05-09-2005, 08:32 PM
those are good for a tenth grader. don't listen to the coachE over there.
realstat23
05-09-2005, 08:33 PM
scrath waht i just said,
Dark Vanilla
05-09-2005, 09:26 PM
I'll take ya all down. Straight up. Run a 10.5, 21.6, and 47.9 respectively in all dese eventz. No playa on earth can stop me
histrionics
05-09-2005, 09:40 PM
I'll take ya all down. Straight up. Run a 10.5, 21.6, and 47.9 respectively in all dese eventz. No playa on earth can stop me
im pretty sure a lot of "playas" on earth could take you down.
they're called olympians
remiks
05-11-2005, 11:13 PM
But anyway, it is really hard to estimate what someone will run in the future. Anything can happen.
vinsanity13
05-11-2005, 11:22 PM
well my state has 3 of the top 10 sprinters in the nation in j-mee samuels and two teammates of mine, Jonathan Hancock (10.3, 20.94 FAT) and Trenton Guy ( 10.5, 21.xx) and a 47.9 in the 400 cud get u to finals in states, but u probly wudnt win. If u were to drop a 46.0 then, ud be a beast but until then, ur jus gud buddy-o-pal
Brumund-Smith
05-12-2005, 03:31 PM
I'll take ya all down. Straight up. Run a 10.5, 21.6, and 47.9 respectively in all dese eventz. No playa on earth can stop me
I'm pretty sure there are a couple thousand people just in this country who can beat you. Nice try though.
wncpreptrackxc
05-18-2005, 08:48 PM
well my state has 3 of the top 10 sprinters in the nation in j-mee samuels and two teammates of mine, Jonathan Hancock (10.3, 20.94 FAT) and Trenton Guy ( 10.5, 21.xx) and a 47.9 in the 400 cud get u to finals in states, but u probly wudnt win. If u were to drop a 46.0 then, ud be a beast but until then, ur jus gud buddy-o-pal
what part of the state are you from?
vBulletin v3.6.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.