Conference Results

[watchout]

Upstate 8: http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/up8101406.html

NV and WV tie with 49, SCN in 3rd with 60.

1 1 Neuqua Valley Christopher Derrick (Jr) 0:14:47.6
2 2 Neuqua Valley Jim Riddle (Jr) 0:15:02.6
4 4 Waubonsie Valley Mark Schumacher (Jr) 0:15:23.5
5 5 St. Charles North Scott Speare (Jr) 0:15:27.1
6 6 St. Charles North Bryan Barker (Sr) 0:15:27.8
7 7 Waubonsie Valley David Schumacher (Jr) 0:15:30.5
8 8 Waubonsie Valley Ryan Shea (So) 0:15:31.9
10 10 Waubonsie Valley Henry Lapka (Sr) 0:15:38.4
13 13 Neuqua Valley Joshua Budnick (Jr) 0:15:49.1
14 14 St. Charles North Max Clink (So) 0:15:53.0
15 15 Neuqua Valley Michael Ruff (Jr) 0:15:55.2
16 16 St. Charles North Jose Sanchez-Vasquez (Sr) 0:15:55.9
18 18 Neuqua Valley Danny Pawola (So) 0:15:58.9
19 19 St. Charles North Zack Johnson (Sr) 0:15:59.2
20 20 Waubonsie Valley Eric Brinlee (Jr) 0:16:11.4


DuPage Valley: http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/DVC101406.htm

NN 34, WN 45, WWS 63, NC 90

1 1 Naperville North Kyle Gibson (So) 0:15:42.2
2 2 Wheaton North Chase Kadlec (Jr) 0:15:43.8
3 3 Wheaton North Graham Farnsworth (Jr) 0:15:46.1
4 4 Wheaton-Warrenville South Peter Casa (Jr) 0:15:48.5
5 5 Wheaton-Warrenville South Winston Zack (Sr) 0:15:51.5
6 6 Naperville North Dan Harper (Jr) 0:15:58.5
7 7 Naperville Central Stephen Couch (Jr) 0:15:58.9
8 8 Naperville North Blake Fisher (Sr) 0:16:05.3
9 9 Naperville North David McWilliams (So) 0:16:09.2
10 10 Naperville North Jon Newman (Jr) 0:16:10.2
11 11 Wheaton North Jack Vebber (Sr) 0:16:10.9
12 12 Wheaton North Justin Soderlund (Jr) 0:16:11.9
13 13 Wheaton-Warrenville South Evan Possley (Sr) 0:16:13.1
14 14 Naperville Central Steven O'Donnell (Jr) 0:16:16.6
15 15 Naperville North Mike Trattner (Sr) 0:16:17.4
16 16 Naperville Central Evan Thayer (Jr) 0:16:20.0
17 17 Wheaton North Collin Christensen (Jr) 0:16:26.1
18 18 Naperville North Paul Boyer (Jr) 0:16:28.0
19 19 Wheaton North Brian Schlick (Jr) 0:16:28.4
20 20 Wheaton-Warrenville South David McHale (Jr) 0:16:39.1
21 21 Wheaton-Warrenville South Michael Haggerty (Jr) 0:16:39.3
25 25 Naperville Central Tim Murphy (Sr) 0:16:44.5
26 26 Wheaton North Ryan Mademann (Jr) 0:16:45.1
28 28 Naperville Central Matthew Somers (Sr) 0:16:53.3


Southwest Suburban Conference Blue: http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/swscblue101406.PDF

Sandburg 17
1 Kevin Adamowski 15:26
2 Tom Sideras 15:31
3 Justin Smith 15:35
5 Brad Larocque 15:40
6 Mik Marbach 15:52
7 Mike Young 15:54
11 Chuck Archer 16:17

Southwest Suburban Conference Red:
http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/swscred101406.PDF

(results are hard to read)

LWE 22
2 Nathan Troester 15:20.5
3 Myles Scot-Stirn 15:29.7
4 Kyle Kirschner 15:45.2
5 Ron Revord 15:51.9
8 Mark Crowlsy 16:36.4



MSL results (incl Palatine & Schaumburg):

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/MSL101406.PDF

Winner: Havel 15:08

Palatine (42):
3 Smoody 15:30
4 Patel 15:38
8 Dettloff 15:55
9 O'Brien 15:58
17 Mourousias 16:16

Schaumburg (56):
2 Spain 15:24
6 Roberts 15:44
13 Ruiz 16:04
15 Link 16:12
21 Burkhardt 16:18

3rd place Hersey had 102; there were 12 teams.


WSC Silver:

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSS101406.PDF

York (20):

2 Achtein 14:37
3 Fry 14:45
4 Kuczwara 15:04
5 D'Ambrogio 15:15
6 Spicer 15:22

6 teams - the younger Sulkin won the soph race in a time that would have made him York's #5.

[watchout]

Toledo City League Championships: http://baumspage.com/cc/toledo/hs/2006/bhs.htm

1 #191 Joe Miller 11 St. John's Jesuit 15:20.42 1
2 #185 Matt Lemon 12 St. John's Jesuit 15:21.52 2
3 #184 Chris Lemon 12 St. John's Jesuit 15:33.60 3
4 #170 Nick Zychowicz 12 St. Francis DeSales 16:29.37 4
5 #155 Colin Pettiford 11 St. Francis DeSales 16:36.76 5
7 #157 Antonio Pringle 12 St. Francis DeSales 16:45.29 7
8 #187 Chris Madaras 10 St. John's Jesuit 16:47.74 8
9 #200 Ben Schoonmaker 12 St. John's Jesuit 16:59.56 9
10 #151 Anthony Jagodzinski 12 St. Francis DeSales 17:02.03 10
11 #206 Brett Wagner 11 St. John's Jesuit 17:14.07 11
13 #144 Eric Aubry 9 St. Francis DeSales 17:23.89 13

1 St. John's Jesuit 23 1 2 3 8 9 11 21
Total Time: 1:20:02.84
Average: 16:00.57
2 St. Francis DeSales 39 4 5 7 10 13 16 18
Total Time: 1:24:17.34
Average: 16:51.47



Portage Trail Conference: http://baumspage.com/cc/portagetrail/2006/bcounty.htm

1 #133 Hilditch, Scott 12 Woodridge 15:42 1
2 #143 Petrak, David 12 Woodridge 16:08 2
3 #83 Dysle, Nicholas 12 East Canton 16:11 3
4 #134 Himelright, Brian 11 Woodridge 16:23 4
5 #136 McCoy, Joey 12 Woodridge 16:27 5
6 #84 Gibson, James 11 East Canton 16:29 6
7 #142 Petrak, Daniel 12 Woodridge 16:44 7
8 #146 Weiss, Matthew 11 Woodridge 16:58 8
9 #135 Marette, Tony 11 Woodridge 16:58 9
10 #85 Henning, Gabe 10 East Canton 16:59 10
11 #144 Rhodes, Michael 10 Woodridge 17:38
14 #86 Long, Chad 10 East Canton 17:56 13
16 #138 Monegan, Jack 11 Woodridge 18:03
18 #89 Rukavina, Joe 11 East Canton 18:15 15

1 Woodridge 19 1 2 4 5 7 8 9
Total Time: 1:21:24.00
Average: 16:16.80
2 East Canton 47 3 6 10 13 15 19 20
Total Time: 1:25:50.00
Average: 17:10.00


Premier Athletic Conference: http://baumspage.com/cc/pac/2006/bhs.htm

I don't know how hard Chardon ran this, but if this was all out ... they may be back. Martin is still well off what would have been hoped, but Paullin looks to have returned.


1 Heineking, Emil Chardon 16:24 1
2 Grau, Luke Chardon 16:40 2
3 Stratman, Matt Chardon 16:55 3
4 Paullin, Steve Chardon 17:07 4
6 Martin, Matt Chardon 17:29 6
8 West, Matt Chardon 17:58 8
9 Toth, Alex Chardon 18:08 9


1 Chardon 16 1 2 3 4 6 8 9
Total Time: 1:24:35.00
Average: 16:55.00




I don't have a link to it, but this is what LaSalle reportedly ran: (I'm assuming they rested the rest of their varsity)

1 Lang 15:20,
2 Spriggs 15:29,
3 Nusekabel 15:33,
8 Meyer 15:48,
10 Thaler 15:50,
?? Kramer 15:55,
?? Gunn 15:56

[pr25]

Toledo City League Championships: http://baumspage.com/cc/toledo/hs/2006/bhs.htm

1 #191 Joe Miller 11 St. John's Jesuit 15:20.42 1
2 #185 Matt Lemon 12 St. John's Jesuit 15:21.52 2
3 #184 Chris Lemon 12 St. John's Jesuit 15:33.60 3
4 #170 Nick Zychowicz 12 St. Francis DeSales 16:29.37 4
5 #155 Colin Pettiford 11 St. Francis DeSales 16:36.76 5
7 #157 Antonio Pringle 12 St. Francis DeSales 16:45.29 7
8 #187 Chris Madaras 10 St. John's Jesuit 16:47.74 8
9 #200 Ben Schoonmaker 12 St. John's Jesuit 16:59.56 9
10 #151 Anthony Jagodzinski 12 St. Francis DeSales 17:02.03 10
11 #206 Brett Wagner 11 St. John's Jesuit 17:14.07 11
13 #144 Eric Aubry 9 St. Francis DeSales 17:23.89 13

1 St. John's Jesuit 23 1 2 3 8 9 11 21
Total Time: 1:20:02.84
Average: 16:00.57
2 St. Francis DeSales 39 4 5 7 10 13 16 18
Total Time: 1:24:17.34
Average: 16:51.47


SJJ's big 3 all under the course record of 15:35 set by Chris Lemon last year. 1-5 gap is down to 1:39

[watchout]

SJJ's big 3 all under the course record of 15:35 set by Chris Lemon last year. 1-5 gap is down to 1:39

so C.Lemon is only 1 second better than last year?

that's not a good sign...

[Miler245]

DeSilva was held out of the UEC Meet for SCN... Assuming DeSilva was healthy and ran at least an average race i would put him in between Speare and Barker... This changes the results and team scores would have been...



SCN
(50) 5,6,7,15,17

NV
(52) 1,2,14,16,19

WV
(53) 4,8,9,11,21


I myself and usually SCN's 4th runner (with DeSilva) and had an off race, either way this is a very close meet, NV 1-2 punch will be an asset at the state meet and WV's 5th might hurt their chances in bigger meets. However injuries are a part of XC so no excuses here all 3 teams ran great and NV came out on top so right now they are the best in the UEC

[DetroiterInIL]

MSL results (incl Palatine & Schaumburg):

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/MSL101406.PDF

Winner: Havel 15:08

Palatine (42):
3 Smoody 15:30
4 Patel 15:38
8 Dettloff 15:55
9 O'Brien 15:58
17 Mourousias 16:16

Schaumburg (56):
2 Spain 15:24
6 Roberts 15:44
13 Ruiz 16:04
15 Link 16:12
21 Burkhardt 16:18

3rd place Hersey had 102; there were 12 teams.


WSC Silver:

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSS101406.PDF

York (20):

2 Achtein 14:37
3 Fry 14:45
4 Kuczwara 15:04
5 D'Ambrogio 15:15
6 Spicer 15:22

6 teams - the younger Sulkin won the soph race in a time that would have made him York's #5.


Personally, I think York trained through this given they knew they had an easy win. The MSL meet was more of a battle with 12 teams; 5 of whom will likely make the state meet; no one could coast.

[watchout]

I would assume that York did, too... they don't need to cut back on training yet.

[greenman]

MSL results (incl Palatine & Schaumburg):

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/MSL101406.PDF

Winner: Havel 15:08

Palatine (42):
3 Smoody 15:30
4 Patel 15:38
8 Dettloff 15:55
9 O'Brien 15:58
17 Mourousias 16:16

Schaumburg (56):
2 Spain 15:24
6 Roberts 15:44
13 Ruiz 16:04
15 Link 16:12
21 Burkhardt 16:18

3rd place Hersey had 102; there were 12 teams.


WSC Silver:

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSS101406.PDF

York (20):

2 Achtein 14:37
3 Fry 14:45
4 Kuczwara 15:04
5 D'Ambrogio 15:15
6 Spicer 15:22

6 teams - the younger Sulkin won the soph race in a time that would have made him York's #5.


Personally, I think York trained through this given they knew they had an easy win. The MSL meet was more of a battle with 12 teams; 5 of whom will likely make the state meet; no one could coast.They may train through all the way up to the week of state. They're going to win their regional and sectional just as easily as this meet.

I wonder what's going to happen this week. The soph Sulkin made the top 5 easily, knocking his brother out, but I've got to think that Newton wants the older Sulkin in the top 7 because he's been a pretty solid #4. York could run their soph team at regional and win it, so I'm kind of wondering if Newton will do something unprecedented and hold out his top 3 at regional and use it as a challenge to give the older Sulkin a shot at getting back into the top 7.

[DetroiterInIL]

Yeah... as someone in the MSL geography, I wish Palatine and Schaumburg could coast - but no such luck. They need to be on. The next 3 teams will likely advance to state - having 5 from the MSL. Usually 4 teams or so from the MSL seem to make it in.

Looking in some detail (Watchout style) at the results; either Havel's getting noticeably better or Smoody/Patel have slipped a hair. Palatine's #3, #4 and #5 seem to be getting stronger though. Who knows. Havel was more dominant than I expected; beating Spain by 16 sec. and Smoody by 22. My gut feeling is that he's rounding into state form.

[watchout]

Interesting point of reference:

In my #'s, I have all the teams' #5s very close to eachother... Neuqua Valley, Palatine, Schaumburg and Sandburg.

Keep in mind that Schaumburg was without their #4 against Palatine, AGAIN. Does Myszka just not like running against Palatine? Lopez was missing from Palatine, too ... or at least wasn't top-5.

[DetroiterInIL]

Interesting point of reference:

In my #'s, I have all the teams' #5s very close to eachother... Neuqua Valley, Palatine, Schaumburg and Sandburg.

Keep in mind that Schaumburg was without their #4 against Palatine, AGAIN. Does Myszka just not like running against Palatine? Lopez was missing from Palatine, too ... or at least wasn't top-5.

Lopez ran and was #6; he was 28th or 29th overall. Lopez is no longer top 5; as he's running similar to how he was last month and Mourosias is running better.

[daman]

Interesting point of reference:

In my #'s, I have all the teams' #5s very close to eachother... Neuqua Valley, Palatine, Schaumburg and Sandburg.

Keep in mind that Schaumburg was without their #4 against Palatine, AGAIN. Does Myszka just not like running against Palatine? Lopez was missing from Palatine, too ... or at least wasn't top-5.Myszka ran, he took the gas and finished 40th.

[watchout]

Myszka ran, he took the gas and finished 40th.

oh.... he's one of those inconsistant types...

thanks

[watchout]

daman, it's looking close... REAL close... between NV and NN, and SCN too!

This is pretty much all the conference meets combined:


York 2 4 11 21 28 66
Sandburg 17 23 24 27 48 139
Palatine 7 9 33 37 63 149
Schaumburg 6 10 38 43 60 157
Naperville North 15 32 40 45 46 178
Neuqua Valley 1 8 51 56 62 178
St. Charles North 12 19 30 52 67 180
Wheaton North 16 18 47 49 75 205
Lincoln-Way East 13 22 41 50 96 222
Waubonsie Valley 26 34 35 44 86 225
Wheaton-Warrenville South 20 25 55 83 84 267
Hersey 3 14 65 93 98 273
Downers Grove North 5 39 78 81 92 295
Prospect 29 68 72 79 85 333
Naperville Central 31 57 64 90 95 337
Lyons Township 53 61 73 80 82 349


Sandburg's LaRocque and Sideras times are not from their conference meets.. they are still from Palatine.

Some of the other previously ranked teams are also like that (Palatine, Neuqua Valley, York, SCN - including DeSilva)

But the majority of times on those teams, and all the times on others, are just from the conference meets...

These may not be the top 16 teams, but I think that they are close to it. I could only get results for the conferences listed before in this thread...

[daman]

daman, it's looking close... REAL close... between NV and NN, and SCN too!

This is pretty much all the conference meets combined:

York 2 4 11 21 28 66
Sandburg 17 23 24 27 48 139
Palatine 7 9 33 37 63 149
Schaumburg 6 10 38 43 60 157
Naperville North 15 32 40 45 46 178
Neuqua Valley 1 8 51 56 62 178
St. Charles North 12 19 30 52 67 180
Wheaton North 16 18 47 49 75 205
Lincoln-Way East 13 22 41 50 96 222
Waubonsie Valley 26 34 35 44 86 225
Wheaton-Warrenville South 20 25 55 83 84 267
Hersey 3 14 65 93 98 273
Downers Grove North 5 39 78 81 92 295
Prospect 29 68 72 79 85 333
Naperville Central 31 57 64 90 95 337
Lyons Township 53 61 73 80 82 349
Sandburg's LaRocque and Sideras times are not from their conference meets.. they are still from Palatine.

Some of the other previously ranked teams are also like that (Palatine, Neuqua Valley, York, SCN - including DeSilva)

But the majority of times on those teams, and all the times on others, are just from the conference meets...

These may not be the top 16 teams, but I think that they are close to it. I could only get results for the conferences listed before in this thread...I think a rejuventated GBS and Geneva may be in that top 16 somewhere.

Did you included Sadlik with NN?

[OnePoint]

daman, it's looking close... REAL close... between NV and NN, and SCN too!

This is pretty much all the conference meets combined:


York 2 4 11 21 28 66
Sandburg 17 23 24 27 48 139
Palatine 7 9 33 37 63 149
Schaumburg 6 10 38 43 60 157
Naperville North 15 32 40 45 46 178
Neuqua Valley 1 8 51 56 62 178
St. Charles North 12 19 30 52 67 180
Wheaton North 16 18 47 49 75 205
Lincoln-Way East 13 22 41 50 96 222
Waubonsie Valley 26 34 35 44 86 225
Wheaton-Warrenville South 20 25 55 83 84 267
Hersey 3 14 65 93 98 273
Downers Grove North 5 39 78 81 92 295
Prospect 29 68 72 79 85 333
Naperville Central 31 57 64 90 95 337
Lyons Township 53 61 73 80 82 349




ok im feeling sorta stupid but i dont get this. the numbers don't make sense as places...so i really dont get it. if its results from conference meets then i dont understand how DGN's number 1 is 5th, but yorks is 2nd, when DGN's clearly beat yorks. incidentally, i run for dgn, and our regional/sectional assignments are so f'ed up in illinois that theres a solid chance we wont even make state. 9 ranked teams are in our sectional, 5 qualify for state. 2 sectionals don't even have ONE ranked team. doesn't make too much sense. no matter WHO makes it in ours, 4 solid solid teams will be left out.

also, watchout, heres results for the WSC Gold Division, which includes Hinsdale South and Downers Grove South, both very solid teams. i've heard the course is 2.96 miles incidentally.

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSG101406.PDF

[daman]

ok im feeling sorta stupid but i dont get this. the numbers don't make sense as places...so i really dont get it. if its results from conference meets then i dont understand how DGN's number 1 is 5th, but yorks is 2nd, when DGN's clearly beat yorks. incidentally, i run for dgn, and our regional/sectional assignments are so f'ed up in illinois that theres a solid chance we wont even make state. 9 ranked teams are in our sectional, 5 qualify for state. 2 sectionals don't even have ONE ranked team. doesn't make too much sense. no matter WHO makes it in ours, 4 solid solid teams will be left out.

also, watchout, heres results for the WSC Gold Division, which includes Hinsdale South and Downers Grove South, both very solid teams. i've heard the course is 2.96 miles incidentally.

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSG101406.PDF

And the thing is, unbalanced sectionals can have an effect on state results, because weaker teams are getting in and won't have an impact on displacement as stronger teams who don't make it would.

[watchout]

I think a rejuventated GBS and Geneva may be in that top 16 somewhere.

Did you included Sadlik with NN?

Sadlik: No, it was just who ran at Conference for NN..

ps, nice post on the NTN NE board... NYers have always whined as much as anyone

[watchout]

ok im feeling sorta stupid but i dont get this. the numbers don't make sense as places...so i really dont get it. if its results from conference meets then i dont understand how DGN's number 1 is 5th, but yorks is 2nd, when DGN's clearly beat yorks. incidentally, i run for dgn, and our regional/sectional assignments are so f'ed up in illinois that theres a solid chance we wont even make state. 9 ranked teams are in our sectional, 5 qualify for state. 2 sectionals don't even have ONE ranked team. doesn't make too much sense. no matter WHO makes it in ours, 4 solid solid teams will be left out.

also, watchout, heres results for the WSC Gold Division, which includes Hinsdale South and Downers Grove South, both very solid teams. i've heard the course is 2.96 miles incidentally.

http://www.illinoispreptoptimes.com/WSG101406.PDF

York's times include bests from the year so far, not just Conference results.

I saw WSC Gold Division ... but that isn't the same course as Silver is it? Because if not, I was trying to find a connection between them and another team listed above in a recent meet, but couldn't find a solid connection...

[daman]

Sadlik: No, it was just who ran at Conference for NN..

ps, nice post on the NTN NE board... NYers have always whined as much as anyoneI like it when you agree with me.

The Bears suck.

[watchout]

I like it when you agree with me.

The Bears suck.

Good point, Bears vs. some crappy team tonight (Arizona?)... you would think that they should roll over them.

and I've always agreed about New Yorkers... the point just never comes up anymore.

I'll laugh if New York doesn't get a team in the top 5 at NTN this year. Even on the girls side, that's a possibility.

Let's see how the NE'ers take that :D then they won't have the inflated egos

EDIT: wow, Chicago needs to play way better D than that.. they'll come back the 2nd half, but the way they are playing now... not looking too good for my NFC Champions claim earlier.

[OnePoint]

York's times include bests from the year so far, not just Conference results.

I saw WSC Gold Division ... but that isn't the same course as Silver is it? Because if not, I was trying to find a connection between them and another team listed above in a recent meet, but couldn't find a solid connection...

no its not the same. its a little bit shorter, but i heard it has sharp turns (i've never run there) id say the times at the WSC silver meet were probably a BIT slower based on the distance but relatively similar between the two

as for a connection..Downers South has run against us at the West Aurora Invite, but you can't really connect us based on that because we majorly choked, so its not even accurate for like differences between the teams. as for hinsdale south i believe they have run against Lyons Township a few times this year, at an early season invite

[watchout]

no its not the same. its a little bit shorter, but i heard it has sharp turns (i've never run there) id say the times at the WSC silver meet were probably a BIT slower based on the distance but relatively similar between the two

as for a connection..Downers South has run against us at the West Aurora Invite, but you can't really connect us based on that because we majorly choked, so its not even accurate for like differences between the teams. as for hinsdale south i believe they have run against Lyons Township a few times this year, at an early season invite

I was hoping for something from Palatine at the earliest... (9/23 on)

more than 3 weeks and it gets iffy.

[OnePoint]

I was hoping for something from Palatine at the earliest... (9/23 on)

more than 3 weeks and it gets iffy.

i found results from hinsdale south at peoria vs. york, benet, prospect, and cary-grove among others. this could be useful in comparing hinsdale south, benet, and dgs...all teams who are probably in that list up there (actually cary grove probably is too). i had heard that hinsdale south was missing runner number 4 in that meet, but im not sure and im too lazy to check

http://www.ivs.org/Results/2006/Central%20Invite/BOYS_INDIVIDUAL.TXT

[watchout]

Daman: threw York into Manhattan. 12:44 average. Breaks the record... and York isn't nearly done yet.

[watchout]

i found results from hinsdale south at peoria vs. york, benet, prospect, and cary-grove among others. this could be useful in comparing hinsdale south, benet, and dgs...all teams who are probably in that list up there (actually cary grove probably is too). i had heard that hinsdale south was missing runner number 4 in that meet, but im not sure and im too lazy to check

http://www.ivs.org/Results/2006/Central%20Invite/BOYS_INDIVIDUAL.TXT

Too much variability in that...

Differences for Hinsdale:
-11
5
8
14
17
22

... that's not uniform enough. and there aren't more than just hinsdale from that conference there?

[daman]

Daman: threw York into Manhattan. 12:44 average. Breaks the record... and York isn't nearly done yet.Gotta wait till state.

[watchout]

I'm thinkin they'll be about 7-8 seconds faster by then... for Manhattan, that would be about 6 seconds better. 12:38.

now I'm gonna post how much the rest of the nation is faster than the NY. See how that gets accepted :D

[DetroiterInIL]

incidentally, i run for dgn, and our regional/sectional assignments are so f'ed up in illinois that theres a solid chance we wont even make state. 9 ranked teams are in our sectional, 5 qualify for state. 2 sectionals don't even have ONE ranked team. doesn't make too much sense. no matter WHO makes it in ours, 4 solid solid teams will be left out.


That's OK; you should see Indiana; about 8 of the top 10 teams are in the same semi-state (which equates to our sectionals). Go figure. A couple of the semi-states don't have any teams even in the top 15. Very, very unbalanced.

[pr25]

so C.Lemon is only 1 second better than last year?

that's not a good sign...

In this meet yes, but not others. i.e. he was 32 seconds faster this year at Tiffin.

[daman]

daman, it's looking close... REAL close... between NV and NN, and SCN too!

This is pretty much all the conference meets combined:

York 2 4 11 21 28 66
Sandburg 17 23 24 27 48 139
Palatine 7 9 33 37 63 149
Schaumburg 6 10 38 43 60 157
Naperville North 15 32 40 45 46 178
Neuqua Valley 1 8 51 56 62 178
St. Charles North 12 19 30 52 67 180
Wheaton North 16 18 47 49 75 205
Lincoln-Way East 13 22 41 50 96 222
Waubonsie Valley 26 34 35 44 86 225
Wheaton-Warrenville South 20 25 55 83 84 267
Hersey 3 14 65 93 98 273
Downers Grove North 5 39 78 81 92 295
Prospect 29 68 72 79 85 333
Naperville Central 31 57 64 90 95 337
Lyons Township 53 61 73 80 82 349
Sandburg's LaRocque and Sideras times are not from their conference meets.. they are still from Palatine.

Some of the other previously ranked teams are also like that (Palatine, Neuqua Valley, York, SCN - including DeSilva)

But the majority of times on those teams, and all the times on others, are just from the conference meets...

These may not be the top 16 teams, but I think that they are close to it. I could only get results for the conferences listed before in this thread...NV had a tough time at regionals. They got into a deeper race and NN was just too good. NV just hung on for 2nd.

[pr25]

Ohio teams all cruise through districts, Woodridge 23 pts., LaSalle 25 pts., SJJ 28 points. SJJ top three clearly didn't run too hard judging by their 36 second gap.