PDA

View Full Version : NXN... 1st 2nd 3rd

xcisalifestyle
12-01-2008, 04:22 PM
Who do you think will win? who will get second and third? discuss.
Hawkeyerunner23
12-02-2008, 01:24 PM
The Woodlands. should have been ranked much lower going into NXN and this should add some fuel to fire
JBro
12-02-2008, 06:26 PM
Dana Hills
ran down
12-02-2008, 09:46 PM
I will give you 1 through 10......
1 Woodlands, 2 Dana, 3 Loyola, 4 Buchannan, 5 Thousand Oaks, 6 Kroy, 7 NorthCentral, 8 Jamestown, 9 Naperville, 10 Bismarck.....
Hey I have my own system.....
heres 11-22.......
11 Cedar Park, 12 Albuquerque, 13 Capital, 14, Utah, 15 Wayzata, 16 Manilaus, 17 Jesuit, 18 Clifton Park, 19 Windsor, 20 Don Boscoe, 21 Wexford, 22 Danbury.....
gobulls26
12-02-2008, 11:30 PM
I think York. They got a strong top 2 that can finish in the top 5. They also have a strong 3-5 split. The x-factor will be Adam Cecil. He was hurt for most of the season. I expect him to be closer to Sulkin/Hebert, which will make the difference. For them to win, they will have to run there best.
borgy
12-02-2008, 11:59 PM
I will give you 1 through 10......
1 Woodlands, 2 Dana, 3 Loyola, 4 Buchannan, 5 Thousand Oaks, 6 Kroy, 7 NorthCentral, 8 Jamestown, 9 Naperville, 10 Bismarck.....
Hey I have my own system.....
heres 11-22.......
11 Cedar Park, 12 Albuquerque, 13 Capital, 14, Utah, 15 Wayzata, 16 Manilaus, 17 Jesuit, 18 Clifton Park, 19 Windsor, 20 Don Boscoe, 21 Wexford, 22 Danbury.....

what is yr system might i add?
watchout
12-03-2008, 01:21 AM
what is yr system might i add?

darts. ;)
borgy
12-03-2008, 09:46 AM
darts. ;)

What if he is like a pro at darts? ;)
ran down
12-03-2008, 08:00 PM
My system is my own system consisting of head to head matchups, taking short 5k courses into consideration, using Chris Derricks known times from last year, using information from big meets, noticing that so many teams have numerous people go under 15 minutes in "big Races" and then when they get to the biggest races, they do not achieve those times when competing against the best, plus using a luck and weather factor. If there is one thing I know about math is that numbers tell a story and you must be willing to listen. The only teams I struggle with are the Caifornia teams, and I might be using bad information, but we will know at about 2:18 mt on Saturday..
LongRunner10
12-03-2008, 09:38 PM
I definitely don't think it will be York, unless Herbert's performance at Foot Locker Midwest last week was a fluke.
kk.
12-03-2008, 10:30 PM
My system is my own system consisting of head to head matchups, taking short 5k courses into consideration, using Chris Derricks known times from last year, using information from big meets, noticing that so many teams have numerous people go under 15 minutes in "big Races" and then when they get to the biggest races, they do not achieve those times when competing against the best, plus using a luck and weather factor. If there is one thing I know about math is that numbers tell a story and you must be willing to listen. The only teams I struggle with are the Caifornia teams, and I might be using bad information, but we will know at about 2:18 mt on Saturday..

You might want to take into consideration that not all courses are equal. There are very few courses in NY for instance where anyone will go under 15. In IL it isn't that rare for runners to go under 15.

Also, with teams not having runners go under 15 in big races.. that has more to do with the different courses and conditions than it does with their actual performance.
AG_TO_RNR
12-04-2008, 02:32 PM
Dana Hills
Woodlands and York will be up there too
Loyola in the top 10 beating Buchannan;)
Thousand Oaks not far from 10th

CA love and bias, but I think I will be pretty accurate
fastrunner12
12-04-2008, 05:26 PM
I will give you 1 through 10......
1 Woodlands, 2 Dana, 3 Loyola, 4 Buchannan, 5 Thousand Oaks, 6 Kroy, 7 NorthCentral, 8 Jamestown, 9 Naperville, 10 Bismarck.....
Hey I have my own system.....
heres 11-22.......
11 Cedar Park, 12 Albuquerque, 13 Capital, 14, Utah, 15 Wayzata, 16 Manilaus, 17 Jesuit, 18 Clifton Park, 19 Windsor, 20 Don Boscoe, 21 Wexford, 22 Danbury.....

you are severely underrating clifton park, they have had severla performances this year that are top 5 or top 3 worthy.
zoominvon1
12-05-2008, 01:05 PM
I definitely don't think it will be York, unless Herbert's performance at Foot Locker Midwest last week was a fluke.

Hebert was spiked at the mile at FLMW and lost his shoe....
runskirun
12-05-2008, 01:31 PM
Hebert was spiked at the mile at FLMW and lost his shoe....

Yeah, there is a short video on the footlocker website, where you can clearly see him running with one foot bare.:eek:
bronco800runner
12-10-2008, 08:42 PM
I will give you 1 through 10......
1 Woodlands, 2 Dana, 3 Loyola, 4 Buchannan, 5 Thousand Oaks, 6 Kroy, 7 NorthCentral, 8 Jamestown, 9 Naperville, 10 Bismarck.....
Hey I have my own system.....
heres 11-22.......
11 Cedar Park, 12 Albuquerque, 13 Capital, 14, Utah, 15 Wayzata, 16 Manilaus, 17 Jesuit, 18 Clifton Park, 19 Windsor, 20 Don Boscoe, 21 Wexford, 22 Danbury.....

way off in the top 10, but take it from a californian, i would have loved to see this happen.
i would have thought some teams like Dana Hills would have done way better, and i was set on Woodlands getting top 3.